Who is Farhan Lalji? Rotating Header Image

Kill the takeover

When I was at Yahoo! one of the things that drove me batty was seeing an advertiser take over a property, either the homepage or some other vertical (like Sports or Movies or some other bit of Yahoo). It’s not that I’m not for capitalism and it’s not that I don’t appreciate the attempt at maximising revenues. I just think for costumers it’s a horrible experience – and usually leads to me screaming, “OH NO! MY EYES! MY EYES!“ in pain.

When you allow an advertiser to buy the whole page, change your background and put some crap over your content, here’s what I believe you’re saying – “Your advertising dollars are worth more than our costumers experience and our product, so allow us to bend over while you have your way with both”.

Here’s a bolt of reality to media owners; consumers, costumers, PEOPLE don’t like advertising, they tolerate it. We understand that there’s a need for businesses to make money so heck show some ads, some body somewhere will think that this Vodka ad on the side of my NBA scores page is relevant and someone will click, it just won’t be me.

Your content, product, whatever you own, better be twice as good as the competition if you’re going to submit your audience to a takeover of your content by an advertiser, because if it’s not, odds are that some portion of your audience won’t come back. Cause wherever you have people doing it for the money, you have people doing it better for the content and for the audience.

So here’s my advice, stop pimping your products out to advertisers. Stop bending over to make an extra couple of bucks. Start offering advertisers better alternatives, creative widgets or whatever that don’t harm the consumer experience but rather enhance it. Start really focusing on creating a better experience for people. Or accept that you’re lazy, don’t care about the people using your product and are out to make a quick buck and watch your product suffer in the long run.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • karimkanji
    Interesting thoughts Farhan as usual. However, the article is a little incomplete. What then is the solution if content providers don't "sell out"? How do they make money. I'm not inferring that advertising in the way you describe is the only answer. It's easy to say stop hurting my eyes. It's more difficult to suggest a way that companies can make money as they provide content.

    Maybe a freemium model is needed or pay for content?

    As a consumer I understand that bills need to be paid. So I don't mind the advertising.
  • I'm not saying advertising needs to go, far from it. I think people understand sites need ads. But it's one thing to sell ads, it's another to sell ads at the expense of the experience.

    Advertisers would love to take over the front page of Google but Google realises that the experience pain and ultimately the cost of having an advertiser take over that page is too expensive.

    Product owners need to be more creative with the advertising they offer brands to ensure that it works for brands but doesn't keep users away from the product or service they were looking for in the first place.

    Complimentary is a nice idea, but too few advertisers and media owners work towards that, instead they work on what's easiest.
  • people dont like all advertising, but they do love it when someone produces something special. thats the real challenge - to engage. to be a help, to entertain - something that actually adds some value to their experience is the holy grail of advertising.

    the rea problem is too many brands being on the hamster wheel - continually turning out campaign after campaign because thats whats been done before, instead of investing time and effort into really thinkng about adding some value.

    i can think of plenty of takeovers that ive both enjoyed (new film releases) and found helpful (ISA deadline etc)

    \so the arguement for me isnt about takeovers, its about relevance and providing value.
  • Takeovers destroy relevance and produce little value. Find me one person who doesn't work for a company using takeovers who enjoys them Andrew. Takeovers prevent people from getting to the content they're looking for.

    Users tolerate ads, in some instances there's something they'll tolerate more, say for example an Iron Man 2 preview, but someone sharing that content on twitter or facebook or even a video within search is a lot less intrusive than an ad taking over a person's experience when they're actually looking for something else.
  • andrew cocker
    find one person? how about the thousands who click on the ads because its something that has tickled their fancy!

    i don't disagree that someone sharing content with a friend is more powerful, but i just can't buy your assertion that people don't like advertising.

    if you are a football fan, tell me you didn't enjoy the nike commercial! and that appeared as a takeover on many sites.

    so i go back to my orignal point - create some value or be relevant and there's plenty of people who will like it. ( obviously not everyone, but there's enough that do!)
  • Thousands that click - a lot of the more savvy users can tell an ad from content and don't click, that's why display click throughs are going down across channels, people can tell things are ad and don't click as much as they used to. Same things happening on mobile, ctr's of around 1% are dropping quickly as people can tell the ads from the content.

    People don't like ads, that's why things like Sky+ and Tivo are popular cause you can skip ads, if people liked advertising then there wouldn't be a need for these services.

    The Nike football ad is a good example of a really good ad, but unfortunately it's more of an exception than the rule. Nike's ad is content it tells a story and doesn't push a product it's brand advertising through a story, not enough advertisers have the brand power to do something this - or the creativity to create content through an advertising channel.

    Agree that advertisers need to create value, and I think creating content is a better way than traditional advertising.
blog comments powered by Disqus